Do intelligence tests measure your actual intelligence? And what does it actually mean to have a high IQ? Let's find out.
As I see it, intelligence is... I'm reading from MYFAROG.[1]Intelligence determines how easily you can learn new things and how well you understand the world around you and the processes taking place in it. That would be my definition of intelligence.
So-called IQ tests show, first of all, and perhaps only, your ability to do great on IQ tests. It's a type of skill, and I can say that with certainty because the more times you take IQ tests, the better results you get. This is just anecdotal evidence, but still, I read, I think in a newspaper or maybe online somewhere, that there's a guy in Israel who has specialised in taking IQ tests and getting good results, and his IQ has been measured to be around 190 or something like that. But when he started out taking out the IQ tests, his IQ was measured to be very, very much lower. However, he became good at solving the type of tests that you get in IQ tests. So now, his IQ is more than 190, or around 190.
And what this obviously means is that it's about skill. It's not intelligence. You don't measure intelligence. If you get 100 IQ in one test, and then you practice and practice and practice, and then you get 190, it doesn't mean that you have become more intelligent. It only means that you have become better at solving these types of tests.
Another thing is that a part of these IQ tests, you find a knowledge part. And what this measures is your knowledge about subjects that they have taken into the test. The IQ tests don't take into account that some people may be very interested in other subjects and have been able to acquire a whole lot of knowledge about that. When used to make people study, IQ tests are, as I see it, dangerous because they are used to flatter, for example, women into giving up their family life and instead focus on a career and "go study, but you're so smart". "Go waste your life on studying", and then when you're 35, you can try to have one baby, but it's probably going to be too late by then. If you are really Intelligent, you will understand that, and decide not to study instead. They don't tell you that, though, when they tell you to go study. So, if you're a traditionalist, IQ tests should be viewed with scepticism because they are often misused to make women who should have been traditional go to focus on their career and studies and stuff.
What we need is the truly intelligent women to have big families, and stay home to home school their children. Because real intelligence is mainly inheritable but can also be slightly ajusted up or down by proper education
If you were able to use these IQ tests in our own culture, on our own, for the first time and know that the person had not been able to practice this type of test taking before, then I guess you could say that it's a way to measure some type of intelligence. But when we are able to take these tests over and over again, and when we, therefore, acquire a skill in taking these tests, then it's no longer a measurement of intelligence, it's a measurement of how many IQ tests you've taken and how good you have become at it, really.
What you get when you send women to college or the university is brainwashed women who hate life and everything natural, and who fail at all their by nature given tasks. "Higher" Education today = Marxist-Capitalist brainwashing.
So, to sum it all up, IQ tests don't measure your intelligence, they measure your skill at taking intelligence tests. And this skill can be increased with practice. So, that's it.
As I see it, intelligence is... I'm reading from MYFAROG.[1]Intelligence determines how easily you can learn new things and how well you understand the world around you and the processes taking place in it. That would be my definition of intelligence.
So-called IQ tests show, first of all, and perhaps only, your ability to do great on IQ tests. It's a type of skill, and I can say that with certainty because the more times you take IQ tests, the better results you get. This is just anecdotal evidence, but still, I read, I think in a newspaper or maybe online somewhere, that there's a guy in Israel who has specialised in taking IQ tests and getting good results, and his IQ has been measured to be around 190 or something like that. But when he started out taking out the IQ tests, his IQ was measured to be very, very much lower. However, he became good at solving the type of tests that you get in IQ tests. So now, his IQ is more than 190, or around 190.
And what this obviously means is that it's about skill. It's not intelligence. You don't measure intelligence. If you get 100 IQ in one test, and then you practice and practice and practice, and then you get 190, it doesn't mean that you have become more intelligent. It only means that you have become better at solving these types of tests.
Another thing is that a part of these IQ tests, you find a knowledge part. And what this measures is your knowledge about subjects that they have taken into the test. The IQ tests don't take into account that some people may be very interested in other subjects and have been able to acquire a whole lot of knowledge about that. When used to make people study, IQ tests are, as I see it, dangerous because they are used to flatter, for example, women into giving up their family life and instead focus on a career and "go study, but you're so smart". "Go waste your life on studying", and then when you're 35, you can try to have one baby, but it's probably going to be too late by then. If you are really Intelligent, you will understand that, and decide not to study instead. They don't tell you that, though, when they tell you to go study. So, if you're a traditionalist, IQ tests should be viewed with scepticism because they are often misused to make women who should have been traditional go to focus on their career and studies and stuff.
What we need is the truly intelligent women to have big families, and stay home to home school their children. Because real intelligence is mainly inheritable but can also be slightly ajusted up or down by proper education
If you were able to use these IQ tests in our own culture, on our own, for the first time and know that the person had not been able to practice this type of test taking before, then I guess you could say that it's a way to measure some type of intelligence. But when we are able to take these tests over and over again, and when we, therefore, acquire a skill in taking these tests, then it's no longer a measurement of intelligence, it's a measurement of how many IQ tests you've taken and how good you have become at it, really.
What you get when you send women to college or the university is brainwashed women who hate life and everything natural, and who fail at all their by nature given tasks. "Higher" Education today = Marxist-Capitalist brainwashing.
So, to sum it all up, IQ tests don't measure your intelligence, they measure your skill at taking intelligence tests. And this skill can be increased with practice. So, that's it.
- First a definition of Intelligence.
Video version of this article
0:05:05
If you're a regular viewer please DON'T try to become a Patreon supporter for as little as $1 per video because they are of course free for me to make. I have NO EXPENSES when I make these vidoes. I only invest my time in them, and my love for my heritage...